The lower court reversed the first instance judgment convicting the Defendant on the grounds that there was no evidence to prove the facts charged of the instant case, and sentenced the Defendant not guilty.

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding occupational duty of care in the crime of occupational injury or injury as alleged in the grounds of appeal, or by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of facts in violation of logical and empirical rules.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.