In addition, all appeals filed by the respondent for attachment order and the prosecutor are dismissed.

A. The gist of the grounds for appeal is (i) misunderstanding the legal principles (the defendant and the person to whom the attachment order was requested) and the person to whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter “the defendant”) did not exercise power in the instant indecent act by force; thus, the rate cannot be determined under Article 7(5) and (2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and the rate should be determined under Article 7(3) of the same Act.

The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is too unreasonable as the defendant's appeal is too unreasonable as to the punishment of the court below (three years and six months of imprisonment). The summary of the grounds for appeal by the prosecutor is that the prosecutor's appeal is too uneasible and unfair.

나. 판단 ⑴ 법리오해 주장에 대하여 ㈎ 성폭력범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법 제7조 제5항 소정의 ‘위력’이라 함은 피해자의 자유의사를 제압하기에 충분한 세력을 말하고 유형적이든 무형적이든 묻지 않으므로, 폭행ㆍ협박뿐 아니라 행위자의 사회적ㆍ경제적ㆍ정치적인 지위나 권세를 이용하는 것도 가능하며, ‘위력’으로써 추행 등을 하였는지 여부는 행사한 유형력의 내용과 정도 내지 이용한 행위자의 지위나 권세의 종류, 피해자의 연령, 행위자와 피해자의 이전부터의 관계, 그 행위에 이르게 된 경위, 구체적인 행위 태양, 범행 당시의 정황 등 제반 사정을 종합적으로 고려하여 판단하여야 한다

(대법원 2007. 8. 23. 선고 2007도4818 판결 참조). ㈏ 이러한 법리에 따라 이 사건을 본다.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, the defendant's age, gender, and physical size (which is a physical size that is just a man of 29 years old age) and the victim's age, gender, physical size (which is the physical size of female son who is merely 11 years old), relationship between the defendant and the victim (the defendant's parent's seat).