도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 4.5 million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the Lone Star vehicle in the Ireland.
On August 4, 2013, at around 17:09, the Defendant driven the above vehicle, and proceeded from the side of the Sungsung Arts Scenic to the Sungsung Elementary School, according to the three-lane 648 way in front of the Gosan-si 648 Gosan-dong, Ansan-si.
In this case, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive the steering gear by accurately operating the steering gear, etc. while living well on the right and the right and the right and the right.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded in the same direction as that of the victim D (36 years of age, south) who was standing in the signal air from two-lanes of the same direction, and received a part as the right side of the vehicle, following the EW Radon-hand side of the fladon vehicle.
The Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, destroyed approximately KRW 1,646,388 of the cost of repairing damaged vehicles, and did not take necessary measures, and left the site as it is, without taking necessary measures.
B. On August 8, 2013, at around 10:30, the Defendant driven the above vehicle, and driven the two-lane road in front of the flusium 685-6, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, at the direction of the two-lane road from the Han River to the flusian 2nd apartment, and led to the right bypass.
In this case, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to drive safely by taking the front side and the left side well.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front left part of GM5 vehicle owned by the Victim F (50 years of age, inn) who was parked on the right side of the course due to negligence in the right side of the vehicle.
The Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, destroyed approximately KRW 940,291 of the cost of repairing damaged vehicles, and did not take necessary measures, and left the site as it is, without taking necessary measures.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;