However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 27, 2017, at around 14:45, the Defendant: (a) cut off 18 sicks, a sum of the market price of KRW 8,750,000,00,000 from February 16, 2016 to May 3, 2017, when the victim G (e.g., 34 years of age) was located on the first floor of FJ in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, the Defendant used the gap in which the victim’s surveillance was neglected and stored.

Accordingly, the defendant stolens the victims' articles 18 times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, T, T, or U;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by cutting off on-site CCTVs;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that each of the crimes in this case has reached 18 times, and that the monetary conversion amount of the damaged goods exceeds 80 million won, the nature of the crime is very bad.

However, considering the fact that the victims have agreed smoothly with the victims, the defendant has an opportunity to reflect by short-term or detained detention, and the defendant has no criminal record, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by considering all the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.