When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 23, 2016, the Defendant changed the contents of the Defendant’s newspaper protocol without permission by using a studio and a studio in which surveillance was neglected while inspecting the Defendant’s newspaper protocol in a criminal case charged by him/her, at the second floor of the 70 Suwon-ro 212 Sinyang-gu, Sinyang-gu, Sinyang-si, 15:50 on November 23, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (overtime 4);

1. Article 141 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, the Defendant and the defense counsel had a mental and physical weakness at the time of committing the instant crime.

The argument is asserted.

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, it is recognized that the defendant has received mental therapy due to symptoms such as a man-made disease, divided disorder, etc., but on the other hand, according to the mental appraisal commission of this case by this court 2016 high 272 against the defendant, the defendant is presumed to have inefficiency as a result of the artificial intelligence and recognition function test on the defendant, but this is more likely to be a result due to the defendant's influence or passive attitude rather than due to the deterioration of the defendant's cognitive function. ② The result of the prior examination by the defendant with an intention to evaluate the most or distorted symptoms of the defendant's mental disorder is considerably highly likely to lead to mental illness (the reference point 23 points in Section 106). ③ The defendant does not have any extreme response to abnormal response at the prosecutor who deals with the abstract depression, or has an inaccurate or distorted tendency with the outside, and it is clearly difficult for the defendant to know that it is not a typical disorder.