물품대금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 41,977,427 among the Plaintiff and KRW 7,981,785 among the Plaintiff, shall be KRW 8,348,100 from January 1, 2017.
1. If there is no dispute between the parties to the judgment as to the cause of the claim or if the purport of the entire arguments stated in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 is added, the plaintiff supplied the defendant with the goods equivalent to KRW 2,942,16 on July 2016, the goods equivalent to KRW 7,981,785 on August 2016, the goods equivalent to KRW 8,348,100 on September 2016, the goods equivalent to KRW 15,174,624 on October 2016, the goods equivalent to KRW 5,410,118 on November 25, 2016, the goods equivalent to KRW 5,062,80 on December 25, 2016, and the plaintiff and the defendant paid the price to the plaintiff on June 16, 2016 upon the expiration of the period from the date on which a tax invoice was issued, and the price was paid to the plaintiff on June 16, 2016, 2016.
Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the total amount of KRW 41,977,427 (i.e., KRW 7,981,785 KRW 8,348,624 KRW 5,100 KRW 15,174,624 KRW 5,118 KRW 5,062,80) and the total amount of KRW 7,981,785 KRW 41,97 KRW 427 from January 1, 2017 following the due date for the payment of KRW 8,348,100 from February 1, 2017 following the due date for the payment of KRW 8,348,624 from March 1, 2017 following the due date to the due date for the payment of KRW 5,410,118 annually from the date following the due date to the due date for payment of KRW 5,506,800 until the due date for the payment of KRW 15,519.15%.
2. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.