When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 14, 2015, around 10:30 on August 14, 2015, the Defendant served as a bath at the event center in front of the C apartment complex center in order to take the place at the center for day-to- day before the mold. However, the Defendant considered that the Defendant brought the remainder of drinking to house (73 years of age).

The phrase "I n't we see that I would have a great concern about the matter, and that I would see the victim in the senior citizen center."

“The victim deemed to have been the victim.”

Doctrine defect "Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine

“I previously held”

The chest and the knife assaulted knife on the breast and the knife.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the witness D’s statutory statement legislation;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant committed assault against the victim on the grounds that the Defendant was dead, and accordingly, the victim appears to have been exposed to considerable mental impulse, and the Defendant’s punishment is desired.

However, there was no criminal history of the defendant, that the defendant has a considerable old age, that of the facts charged against the defendant, and that of the facts charged against the defendant, it was judged not guilty as shown below, but that maintaining the sentence in the summary order already issued is unreasonable. The above sentencing factors are the sentencing factors favorable to the defendant, and the above sentencing factors are determined as ordered by the sentence for the defendant, considering both the defendant's age, sex behavior, environment, etc.

The acquittal portion

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in the judgment, fry the head of D with drinking, fry the head of D, and fry the head of D, and fry the fry the chest of D, thereby having D receive injury, such as a fry fry fry, which requires D to provide medical treatment between 28 days of the 28 days of the fry.