An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

At around 05:00 on March 16, 2013, the Defendant used the victim C, victim F, victim G, and victim G to dance, with a string space of 9,80,000 won in the victim C’s market value, one jumt per 1,000 won in the market value of 60,000 won in the market value, one jumt 1,000 won in the market value of 2,000 won in the market value, one jum 1,000 won in the EGG and 3,000 won in the market value of 3,00,000 won in the market value, 1,50,000 won in the aggregate of 3,00,000 won in the market value, 1,32,000 won in the market value, 1,300,000 won in the market value of the victim’s 1,70,000 won in the market value.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Partial statement of the defendant in the police interrogation protocol of the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Written statements of C, F and G;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and photographs;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion regarding the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion under Articles 32(1) and (2) and 25(3)3 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Litigation, etc. of Application for Compensation Order, because the defendant alleged that he was in a state of mental and physical disability because he did not memory under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime of this case. Thus, the defendant's assertion