사해행위취소
1. On December 24, 2008, the Defendants and Nonparty D as to shares in 2/9 of each real estate indicated in the separate sheet.
1. The following facts are based on the following facts: (a) the Plaintiff and the Defendants did not dispute each other; (b) the entry of the evidence No. 2-1 to No. 3; and (c) the market price appraisal of this court; and (d) the purport of the entire pleadings as to the fact-finding of the Glim Credit Union in this court.
Attached Form
On December 24, 2008, the Defendants agreed to jointly inherit each of the instant real estate as one-half shares (hereinafter “instant inheritance division agreement”) on December 24, 2008, each of the instant real estate on the grounds of inheritance by agreement division on February 3, 2009, the Young-gu Seoul Southern District Court, Young-gu District Court, etc., received on February 3, 2009, and received on February 3, 2009, each of the Defendants’ share transfer registration was completed under the name of 1/2 under the name of the co-inheritors, i.e., the deceased’s spouse F and lineal descendants.
B. At the time of the consultation on the division of the inherited property of this case, D had no particular property other than the active property inherited from the network E. As to each of the instant real property, the establishment registration of the mortgage was completed with respect to each of the instant real property with a maximum claim amount of KRW 195 million. At the time of the death of the network E, the secured debt of the said right to collateral was KRW 50 million, but the said right to collateral security was revoked on June 29, 2009.
C. On December 14, 2007, with respect to each of the instant real estate, a commercial building lease agreement of KRW 15 million and KRW 8 million was concluded, respectively, and a housing lease agreement of KRW 50 million was concluded. The current market price of each of the instant real estate is equivalent to KRW 487,24,360.
2. The Plaintiff leased KRW 50 million to Nonparty G around October 2007 when determining the existence of the Plaintiff’s preservation claim against Nonparty D, and D upon request from the Plaintiff and G, and upon receipt of the request from the Plaintiff, on August 27, 2008, No. 85 of the law firm good offices issued on August 27, 2008.