beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.31 2014고단3577

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)등

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant established and operated the D Hospital with the victim E (the age of 43) on November 201, 2010, but there is a dispute between the victim and the hospital share adjustment issue. The Defendant, on October 2013, issued rebates from the Daegu District Public Prosecutor’s Office on the ground that the Defendant received the rebates from the medical device company, and the Defendant was asked from the Daegu District Public Prosecutor’s Office to be present, and the Defendant should be held accountable for the Defendant’s criminal liability for receiving rebates. However, the Defendant was able to say that the victim was unaware of himself and became the victim.

On November 11, 2013, at around 07:06, the Defendant was driving a BMW car with two lanes from the street located in the Blackdong in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, with an intention to discover and threaten the victim, while driving the CM car with three lanes in the same direction.

The Defendant, while driving the said BMW car in the left side of the car driving by the victim, has changed the lane rapidly to the lane on which the victim was driving, and has expressed the attitude that the victim would cause any harm to the body, etc. of the victim.

The Defendant carried a dangerous object, and threatened the victim with the vehicle.

B. On November 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) while driving a BMW car along the two-lanes on the front of the CMW car located in the new-dong, Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the road; (b) while driving the BM car on the front of the CM car, the Defendant tried to discover the AM car driven by the victim who was driving along the one-lane and to threaten the victim.

The Defendant, while driving the said BMW car and driving by the victim, reduces speed by driving the bM car in the future, and the victim changed the lane into the two lanes, the Defendant also changed the two lanes to the two lanes, and the victim changed the three lanes to the three lanes, and the Defendant also changed the three lanes.