(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.07.05 2016고단2120
도로법위반
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. A’s violation of restrictions on operation of vehicles around November 27, 2006, which is an employee of the defendant specified in the facts charged, around 23:54;
2. Since punishment laws applied to a summary order subject to review have lost effect retroactively according to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality, the Defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.