2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with B.

B. B, on December 8, 2012:40, while driving the Oral Ba on December 8, 2011, sustained injury by exceeding the 284 B’s intersection in front of the 284 rice Luxembourg market, according to the Busan’s annual system.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant traffic accident”). C.

At the time, the defendant was on the crosswalk at the right side of the intersection where the error of the B driving is going to the direction without going to his office.

2. The plaintiff's argument on the plaintiff's assertion asserts that the defendant's driver is liable to pay 8,554,805 won to the plaintiff who subrogated to B as compensation for damages caused by the traffic accident in this case, since the plaintiff was about to escape from the above road to the above road on the right crosswalk of the road where the plaintiff's driver's Obato drive B is driving.

In light of the following circumstances, Gap evidence 5-6, Eul evidence 5-6, Eul evidence 5-7, Eul evidence 1, 3, and 4, the witness of the traffic accident of this case stated that the defendant was under suspension at the crosswalk in order to divide his and his and her own personnel at the time, and even if the defendant had been under suspension, it is difficult to eliminate the possibility of the traffic accident of this case before entering the road where the plaintiff was under way, since Eul's evidence 2, Gap evidence 4-1, 2, 4, 5-1, 5-1, 5-1, 5-1, 5-1, or image of the traffic accident of this case, the plaintiff's driver at the time of the traffic accident of this case was under way to cross-spons the road on the crosswalk, or Eul tried to avoid the traffic accident of this case.