If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

The Defendant is a person who had worked as the electrical safety supervisor of the company C from 2007, and the selection of the roof construction company of the company E in Gwangju Seo-gu is determined by the consultation between the market merchant's association and the Seo-gu Office of Gwangju, and the Defendant could not have influence on the selection of the above construction company within budgetary limits. The Defendant could not have an influence on the selection of the above construction company, and the Defendant could not have a roof work for the victim F (the age of 41) even if he did not receive any money because he did not know about the business related to the owner of the roof of the market, nor did he would have no intention or ability to return the money to the victim, even if he thought that he would use the received money as the alcohol value or entertainment cost and did not intend to return the money to the victim.

However, in October 2013, the Defendant sent KRW 5 million to the post office account in the name of the Defendant for operating expenses and operating expenses from the victim on October 22, 2013, and decided to block C’s roof materials in the second public hearing related to the above roof, despite the fact that H companies affiliated with the victim F, who is specialized in construction of polybine G, would have been able to take over the above construction works several times. It would be possible for the victim to take over the roof of the E market on December 20, 2013. It would be possible for the victim to take over all the money to be paid without being paid by the victim. It would be difficult for the victim to take over the above construction works under the name of the victim on December 20, 2013 without being paid by the victim on December 20, 2013.