beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.01.27 2012가단197373

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. As a dentist, the Plaintiff is the representative of the E Hospital Group (hereinafter “E Group”) which is the network of more than 100 dental hospitals established in the Republic of Korea and the United States of America, and the Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant newspaper company”) is a press corporation established and operated for the purpose of newspaper publication, etc. The Defendant C is the director general of the Editor of the Defendant newspaper company, and the Defendant D is a dentist who is a member of the Korea Dental Association, who has made advisory advisers to the Defendant newspaper company.

C. Around June 18, 2012, Defendant D administered an adviser, such as the attached list of “F” (hereinafter “instant adviser”) to Defendant newspaper company, and this article was published on the B website.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff asserts that the contents of "Apparent ①" among the advisers of this case fall under a statement of false facts sufficient to impair the plaintiff's reputation or an anti-defensive expression sufficient to undermine the social evaluation. Among the advisers of this case, the plaintiff asserts that "Apparent ②" among the advisers of this case was damaged the plaintiff's reputation by violating the principle of anonymous reporting on crime news by following the real name of E, and sought compensation for mental damage caused by the tort against the defendants.

① A certain person sells goods at a low price in disregarding the illegality and stability (hereinafter referred to as “Apparent ①”). ② The content of the E criminal suspicion that he/she performed a proteanisony without permission (hereinafter referred to as “Apparent ②”). In this regard, the Defendant asserted that the instant advisory adviser was prepared solely for the public interest, and that the alleged facts were all true, and even if not true, the illegality of the Plaintiff’s claim is dismissed due to considerable reasons to believe that it is not true.

3...