When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one shall sell drugs, etc. harmful to juveniles to juveniles.

1. The Defendant committed a crime on December 23, 2015, sold three alcoholic beverages, which are alcoholic beverages harmful to juveniles, to F (18 tax) who are customers of the said restaurant, at the E-cafeteria located in the Chungcheongbuk-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do, around 03:30 on December 23, 2015.

2. On December 28, 2015, the Defendant committed a crime on December 28, 2015, sold three alcoholic beverages, which are alcoholic beverages harmful to juveniles, to G (V, 17 years old) who is a customer of the said restaurant, at around 23:50 around December 28, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment No. 1]

1. Statement made by the witness H in the seventh public trial records;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the defendant (a right nine pages to the investigation record);

1. A written statement of the applicant (a right and six pages for investigation records);

1. F’s confirmation [The defendant and his defense counsel only sold alcoholic beverages to two adult adults on the date and time stated in the ruling No. 1, and the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that F is later combined.

However, according to the following circumstances that can be seen by comprehensively taking account of the above evidence, i.e., ① the F was seated inside the wall near the wall on the day of the instant case, and the C was f was seated in the test table, and the Defendant’s certificate was written on the same day, and the F did not appear later. He stated that the Defendant, a police officer regulating the dispatch to the scene at the time, did not memory; ② the Defendant was investigated by the police on the day following the instant case, and the Defendant was aware of the fact that the customer, who was a juvenile, was not a juvenile by inspecting the identification card before his hand.

Along with the two singles, a juvenile thought that he was not a youth as a matter of course, and his face did not have an identification card showing the mature face, and the defendant was expressed only to the effect that he was not a youth, and ③ up to the third trial date, the defendant was F.