매매대금
1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:
The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs KRW 90,380,01 and the defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs on January 2018.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On October 15, 2015, the Defendant entered into a real estate sales contract of this case. On October 15, 2015, each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant land”) from the Plaintiffs, and the building listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2, and the building listed in the separate sheet Nos. 3, 3, “instant building.” In addition, the instant land and buildings collectively
) A contract was entered into to purchase the purchase price of KRW 1.5 billion (a contract amounting to KRW 180 million, KRW 1.32 billion, and KRW 1.32 billion) (hereinafter “instant contract”).
The contents of the instant sales contract are as follows.
Special Pharmags
1. The current status of sale; 2. The loan of the real estate in this case is KRW 775 million and the obligation to refund the lease deposit attached to the annexed sheet 50 million and KRW 548.2 million are taken over by the defendant and deducted from the purchase price.
(Total Amount of deduction KRW 1.32 billion). 3. At the Defendant’s request, the registration of ownership shall be separately made with respect to the instant building and land (a sales contract, etc. shall be separately prepared and the ownership of the instant building shall be transferred at the same time as this contract is executed). The sale amount and transfer form shall run at the Defendant’s request.
4. The scope of the obligation to return the lease deposit that the Defendant assumed by the Defendant is limited to the amount on the current status of lease attached to the attached Form, and if any additional obligation to return the lease deposit is incurred thereafter, it shall be
(Provided, however, as of October 31, 2015, when there is a unpaid monthly rent of a lessee who is currently in possession as of the base date, the rent has the right to receive by the Plaintiffs, and the subsequent rent has the right to receive by the Defendant). 5. The reason why the Defendant pre-transfer the registration of ownership transfer of the building of this case to the Defendant is an inevitable measure for the reorganization and identification of the current building administrator, and if the Defendant is unable to pay the remainder on the remainder date, the parties are separately entitled.