However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the Grandland Kapool.

On April 13, 2018, the Defendant, around 14:55 on April 13, 2018, proceeded one lane from the three-lanes in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, toward the direction of the master distance of the Red Cross.

Since the signal apparatus is installed at the front of the time, in such cases, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to properly observe the signal, to properly see the right and the right and the right of the front side, and to operate the steering and the operation of the steering system accurately.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected this, left as it is, and received from the left side of the Defendant’s proceeding, the right side part of the Victim E (31) drive F1200 cc o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s h

The Defendant, due to such occupational negligence, caused the victim E to suffer salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately 3 weeks of treatment, and the victim G to suffer approximately 12 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. In light of the fact that the negligence of the defendant who caused the accident by violating the signal at the intersection of the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following factors favorable to the defendant among the reasons for sentencing) and the fact that the injury of one of the two victims requires the treatment of 12 weeks, the criminal liability of the defendant is heavy.

(b).