If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is a person who drives B rocketing another car.

On February 9, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 08:40, and driven the 243-ri-ro, Seogu, Daegu-gu, Seoggu, about 40km from the parallel parallel of North Korea to the parallel of North Korea at about 40km each hour.

The defendant has a duty of care to drive at a speed or in a manner that does not pose any danger and obstacle to other vehicles and people by passing along the right side of the median line.

Nevertheless, while the Defendant neglected this and went into two-lanes from the opposite direction to the collision, the part of the front part of the DNA car driven by the victim C driving in two-lane from the opposite direction to the flat-distance distance is collisioned with the front part of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle, the damaged vehicle is pushed ahead by the shock, and the latter is proceeding in the rear side of the two-lane.

The driver of the victim E, who is driving on the right side, conflict with the front part of the F-A-Wurn-Wurn Motor Vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, from the above occupational negligence, the victim C, who is a DNA driver of the damaged vehicle, about 8 weeks’ stability cost, the auxiliary call-up, the knenee bones, etc., which requires a transitional observation, and the victim E, who is a F driver, suffered from the injury, such as drug treatment for about 15 days during the treatment period, progress observation and stability.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each written statement E and C;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. A photograph of a distress image closure;

1. Application of each written diagnosis and written estimate under the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The order of provisional payment;