For reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the ground that there was no proof of a crime against occupational injury or death among the facts charged against the Defendant.

Examining the record, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations, but did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on proximate causal relation in the crime of occupational death.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.