beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.11.30 2016가단31205

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 3,38,670 to Plaintiff A, KRW 1,00,000 to Plaintiff C, and KRW 1,00,000 to Plaintiff D, and the above amount.

Reasons

1. The occurrence of damage liability;

(a)The following facts are not in dispute between the Parties:

1) Plaintiff C is the father of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff D is the mother of Plaintiff A. 2) Defendant E is the father of Plaintiff A. Defendant F is the father of G, and Defendant F is the mother of G, who is the person with parental authority.

3) Plaintiff C and G were half-year students in the sixth grade of H elementary school. 4) G announced on July 9, 2015, and Plaintiff C’s Council members who want to sit back to the place after attending the school hours on July 9, 2015, and Plaintiff C left the floor as they were.

As a result, the plaintiff C suffered from the injury to the balone of the balones.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

According to the above facts, G appears to be a student in the sixth grade of elementary school before and after the age of 12. As such, G is a person under no legal responsibility to change its legal responsibility. Therefore, the Defendants, the parents of G, jointly and severally, pursuant to Article 755(1) of the Civil Act, are liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the above tort committed by G.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. 1) The Plaintiffs asserts that 10,762,366 won was incurred due to the instant accident. 2) In full view of the overall purport of the statement of evidence Nos. 4, 5, 1, and 2 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the entire pleadings, the Plaintiffs asserted that the Plaintiff was discharged on July 9, 2015 after being hospitalized in I Hospital on July 25, 2015, and that the Plaintiff was released on July 1, 2015, following the Plaintiff A’s month.

8.25 It is recognized that the 25th day after cleaning at a school had been inflicted an injury on the strokes, strokes, strokes, strokes, and tensions of the strokes.

In full view of such circumstances, although the medical expenses received by the Plaintiff A before August 25, 2015 can be deemed as ordinary damages having proximate causal relation with the instant accident, the evidence alone submitted by the Plaintiff may be recognized as having proximate causal relation with the instant accident.