If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant is a motor vehicle dealer as the representative of “D” in the building C at the net time.

A motor vehicle dealer shall not notify a person who inspects the performance and condition of a motor vehicle by fraud of the details of the inspection of the performance and condition of the structure, devices, etc. of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, on January 31, 2017, the Defendant notified the buyer of the record for inspection of the performance and condition of used cars prepared falsely for E vehicles, including notification of the record for inspection of the performance and condition of used cars to F. The Defendant notified the buyer of the record for inspection of the performance and condition of used cars prepared falsely for eight times from January 31, 2017 to March 13, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to G;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of inspection of performance and condition of each motor vehicle, and the ledger of registration of each motor vehicle;

1. Article 80 of the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 80 subparagraph 7 of the Automobile Management Act and Article 58 (1) of the same Act concerning the selection of punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged is the person who is a motor vehicle dealer as the representative of “D” in the building C in netcheon City.

A motor vehicle dealer shall not notify a person who inspects the performance and condition of a motor vehicle by fraud of the details of the inspection of the performance and condition of the structure, devices, etc. of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant notified the buyer of the record of the performance and condition inspection of used cars prepared in a false manner more than twice as shown in the list 2 and 3 attached crimes.

2. The following circumstances, which can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, namely, the defendant's own motor vehicles of the attached Table 2, 3 at an investigative agency.