The part of the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively weaponed weapons, etc., damage, etc.) was only one set of the string of the victim vehicle even after the string of the string of the string of the vehicle. There was no difference in the glass of the said vehicle or pent

Due to the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a partial parking of a deadly weapon, etc.), while the victim and the victim were in sight, they did not only display an Aluminum bar in order to protect the defendant first by threatening the defendant, but not inflict any injury on the victim.

In violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act, the police officer only laid the knife knife onto the ground, and there was no threat of the victim in the knife knife.

Judgment

The victim made a statement from an investigative agency to the court of the court below that corresponds to each criminal fact in the judgment below. Since the contents of the statement specifically describe the Defendant’s words before and after the instant case, and there is no other motive to make a false statement unfavorable to the Defendant, the credibility of the statement is recognized.

In addition, the witness G's statement in the court below also corresponds to the victim's statement and the victim's statement.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit, since it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant committed a crime like the facts stated in the judgment of the court below.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the first head of the judgment of the court below shall be corrected to add "the defendant committed the following crimes in a state that he/she has the ability to discern things or make decisions due to a stimulative disorder, a stimulative disorder, etc.)."