On November 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 22, 2016, in the “D Apartment Park-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government,” the representative monthly meeting was in progress; (b) as a result of a conflict of opinions, the Defendant made a threat to the risk of the above victims, while holding the excessive amount in the main bank of the senior citizens, and on one’s side, made intimidation.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the defendant's and defense counsel's assertion was in excess of the defendant's excessive possession at the time of the instant case, but it was intended to prepare for a harsh appearance and desire by the victim from a special unit because the victim, who had a strong physical attack, was fluencing the defendant with a view to provoking the defendant, and there was no threat to the victim or a threat of harm and injury.

B. According to the records, the defendant and the victim et al. were conducting a monthly conference at the senior citizens' meeting on the day of the instant case, but the victim had been aware of a dispute between the defendant and the victim in relation to the receipt of the judgment by filing a lawsuit for damages against the representative of the occupants as a legate system, and the defendant has been able to go forward and sit back on the side of the defendant's home page, and the victim who observed it had been 112 reported.

In addition, the victim made a statement at the investigative agency that "the defendant was dead, discarded, and knife the knife, knife the knife and knife the knife next to the knife."

2) On the other hand, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the victim’s statements in this Court, the evidence alone presented by the prosecutor that the Defendant threatened the victim as if the Defendant would cause harm to the victim as stated in the instant facts charged.

The recognition is insufficient, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

(1) A victim shall be present at this Court.