When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 29, 2015, the Defendant, at around 22:15, 2015, posted a disturbance to B, who was a taxi engineer, prior to the departure of 1217 B, located in the city of 1217, at the center of Busan, and was influenced by a slope D, who was dispatched to the site upon receipt of a report 112, in order to make the Defendant correct the Defendant. (b) The Defendant fluentdd D’s face of D, who was a defective fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent flus.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the laws and regulations on police statements made to B and D;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;