A. The facts of recognition (i) Defendant E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is a company engaged in the automobile parts manufacturing business, etc., Defendant D is a person who works for the Defendant Co., Ltd. at the Defendant Co., Ltd.’s chemical establishment located in C (hereinafter “UP”), and G is a person who works for the factory at the cafeteria located in the chemical establishment, and Plaintiff A is the husband of G, and Plaintiff B and C are children of G.

B. At around 07:20 on March 15, 2014, Defendant D moved approximately 5-6 km to a warehouse located in a 2 ton unit without a vehicle number, one of the weight of 700 km, which contains waste vinyl, into a luxed warehouse in a luxable place of business.

Article 22(1) of the Act provides that a person engaged in the business of operating a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely operate the motor vehicle after checking whether there is any obstacle, such as a person or object, etc., in the direction of the operation, or by allowing a separate signal number to check whether there is any obstacle in the movement direction of the motor vehicle.

x) Nevertheless, Defendant D did not discover G in the direction of the above line by negligence that neglected the duty of care in the above Section 1, but instead received it as it was, and thereby, G died by the multilateral aggregate.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). [The grounds for recognition: the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including the number, if any, and the same shall apply hereinafter)

(2) Each entry and the purport of the whole pleading

B. According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant D, as an illegal act, is jointly and severally liable for damages suffered by Defendant D’s tort G and the Plaintiffs, as an employer of Defendant D.

(c) responsibility;