정정보도 등 청구의 소
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning a request for a corrective statement related to the report on the extension of test launch from Korea (KSV-2).
1. The reasoning for this part of this Court’s basic factual basis is that it is identical to the underlying facts of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, and thus, the reasoning for this part is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420
2. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiff sought a corrective report, indirect compulsory performance, and damages as to the extension of launch period, ② the development period of liquid engines, ③ the development costs of liquid engines, from among the articles of this case 1 and 2, against the Defendants in the first instance trial. In addition, the Plaintiff also sought a counterargument report on the extension of launch period, ⑤ the development period of liquid engines, ⑤ the development period of liquid engines, ⑤ the foreign technical dependence and ④ the audit of the Plaintiff’s business and the part on the delay of the development of the petroleum engine among the articles of this case 3, 4, and 5.
The court of first instance dismissed the part of the article No. 1 and No. 2 of this case, citing the part seeking indirect compulsory performance and compensation for damages, and citing the part claiming a counterargument report concerning the delay in the development of petroleum engines among the articles No. 3, 4 and 5 of this case, which sought a counterargument report among the articles No. 1 and 2 of this case.
As a result, this Court has appealed only to the defendants, this Court has judged only the part of the plaintiff's claim against the defendants cited by the court of first instance.
3. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment
(a) paragraph 2-A of the grounds for the judgment of the first instance with respect to this part of the quoted judgment of the first instance;
(b) paragraphs 5 and 0, 3-b, 3-c, and 4;
B. The corresponding portions of paragraphs 5 and 3 are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The determination of the claims for a corrective statement of the instant part ① is made as follows; ② the determination of the following sub-paragraph (c) is added to the claims for a corrective statement of the instant part ②, ③ the determination of the claims for a corrective statement of the instant part; ③ the determination of the claims for a corrective statement of the first instance judgment as set forth in sub-paragraph
B. A request for a corrective statement concerning the extension of launch.