except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

When the defendant helps the victim B who resides in the same apartment house to arrange the removal of the victim B, and came to know of the fact that the victim did not carry the above residence, he thought that he stolen the property between the victim and the victim.

At around 22:30 on October 9, 2018, the Defendant: (a) opened an apartment entrance without any people; (b) intruded into the said residential area; and (c) laid off things equivalent to KRW 93,000 in total amounting to KRW 1,40,000, the injured party’s share of KRW 800,000, which is the victim’s ownership, at the end of Cheongju-si, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Cheongju-si; and (d) took advantage of things equivalent to KRW 93,00,00, the amounting to KRW 1,40,000, which is equivalent to KRW 1,40,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing photographs of each damaged article;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment for one month to ten years; and

2. Six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a decision of sentence, two years of suspended sentence, and two years of suspended sentence: Circumstances that are favorable to the failure to recover damage: The defendant seems to reflect the case, and there are no records of the same kind of power or suspended sentence or more, and the above circumstances shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances before and after the crime.