On July 15, 2016, the Defendant demanded that the Victim B (A) who was in an internal relationship at a non-explosive location around 23:06, which was the victim B (A) and 39 years of age, reached the victim repeatedly via an information and communications network 15 times in total, including sending the victim’s husband’s text message as if the Defendant was her husband, with the victim’s mobile phone (C) who did not met, and was aware of the fact that D was coming up with the victim’s mobile phone (C).”

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the publication of letters;

1. Articles 74 (1) 3 and 44-7 (1) 3 (including comprehensive) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, the punishment of imprisonment is to be imposed;