Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

On March 26, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for robbery, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Southern District Court on June 24, 2017. On September 8, 2017, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced the Defendant to six months of imprisonment and fine of twenty million won for violating the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Acts by minor enforcement under the age of thirteen), and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Southern District Court on January 14, 2018.

1. On January 22, 2018, at the main point of “D” operated by the injured party C on the third floor of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building B, the Defendant: (a) went home to the police officers who called out while drinking and drinking expenses to his employees and customers; (b) however, the Defendant: (c) opened a vehicle with the main entrance and opened a car and opened a bitch of bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a b

C. For about one hour, he saw the disturbance as a large sound, and interfered with the victim's main business by force.

2. The Defendant damaged property at the time, time, and place of paragraph 1, as set forth in paragraph 1, and damaged the victim’s property so that the Defendant need to repair the amount by putting the front door of the entrance in walking with the door door.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Photographs of damaged articles;

1. Previous conviction: References to inquiries, such as criminal history, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316 of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the said Act (the punishment shall be increased by the penalty stipulated for a obstruction of heavier business, but the total amount of two crimes shall be the same);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant committed an act interfering with his duties.