2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by C.

According to the evidence evidence Nos. 3, 4, 8, and 17, C shall be the Plaintiff’s paper grandchildren, the fact that C is the Plaintiff’s paper grandchildren, the Plaintiff’s door-to-door meeting held on December 10, 1970, and December 10, 1985 that C shall be the Plaintiff’s representative, and the Plaintiff’s door-to-door meeting held on January 10, 1994 decided that C shall be the representative for the registration of ownership transfer under the Plaintiff’s name at the Plaintiff’s door-to-door meeting held on January 10, 1994. The fact that C was registered as above around that time is recognized.

However, in addition to the whole purport of the arguments in Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 6, the defendant is represented by the plaintiff's representative on July 21, 2001, the identification number certificate (Evidence No. 4) for the plaintiff in the name of the director of the tax office of the racing on July 21, 2001, and the plaintiff's door held on February 15, 2003 was enacted by the National Assembly, and Eul is represented by the plaintiff under Article 11 subparagraph 2 of the above Rule. Article 11 subparagraph 3 of the above Rule. Article 19 of the Rule provides that "A shall be represented by the president, G, and H on behalf of the president in the order of the extension of the period of time public notice of the president. Article 19 of the Act on the administrator is accompanied by the meeting minutes (Evidence No. 2-1 of the above Rule) of the above Rule, and the operator is not required to write his name, resident registration number, address, and signature of the chairperson at the time of the above E Rule.

Therefore, C was the Plaintiff’s representative in the past.

Even if the plaintiff's text held on February 15, 2003, E is the president of the Gowon General Assembly.