If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

On December 21, 2014, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent the location of images, etc. from being exposed to other people, etc. due to the following reasons: (a) around 02:30 on December 21, 2014, the Defendant had been in contact with the victim E (n, 37 years of age) and dancing (n, e.g., the Defendant) who was in contact with the Defendant, and the said room is working in a narrow and narrow room; and (b) in such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent the location of images, etc. from being exposed to other people.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while drinking, took dancing with the victim without fulfilling the above duty of care, was faced with the victim, and the victim was able to go beyond this duty, and the part of the victim's her mare and the part of the back side of his mare in contact with the above mar, thereby resulting in the victim's serious 2 degrees of image, such as the part requiring approximately four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each statement of the witness E and F in the second public trial records;

1. Some statements made to G in the police statement protocol;

1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment of medical records);

1. A medical certificate;

1. The victim's photograph (the defendant and his defense counsel did not face the victim at the time of the occurrence of the instant case, and the victim was frighted so that the victim was her back her back her back her back her back hered, and suffered pictures. However, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence of the judgment, i.e., (i) the victim and the F who witnessed the occurrence of the instant case at the time of the occurrence of the instant case her back her back her back her back her back her back her back her back her back her back her back her back to this court, and (ii) the degree of pictures displayed on the victim's photograph taken by the victim's video her front her back (in the investigation record No. 6 pages), rather than the defendant's statement (in the investigation record No. 92) that the victim tried to have the victim more than the victim's back her back her back her back her.