The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the court of first instance, the court below’s determination that the charged facts of this case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is just, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the relevant legal principles

In addition, the argument that the court below erred in the violation of the rules of evidence or incomplete deliberation due to the error in calculation of the period of employment is not a legitimate ground for appeal, as alleged in the ground of appeal that the defendant did not consider it as the ground for appeal or as the subject of judgment ex officio.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.