The sentencing of the lower court (one hundred months of imprisonment, and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In light of the sentencing of the same and similar cases, the court below seems to have set the punishment in consideration of the circumstances favorable to the defendant in light of the motive and background of the crime in this case, circumstances after the crime in this case, the defendant's age after the crime in this case, character and conduct, environment, etc., and the fact that the crime in this case was committed on a single-time medication, which are favorable to the defendant, was committed more than 15 times, including the fact that the defendant was punished five times for the same crime. In particular, the defendant was sentenced for 8 months of imprisonment for the same crime in the same kind of crime, and more than 3 months have not passed since he was released from the prison, and the defendant committed the crime in this case. In light of the sentencing of the same kind of crime in this case, it is unreasonable to deem that the sentencing of the court below is too too unreasonable.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition