In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

1. Defendant B, at around 03:30 on February 11, 2017, had the face of the Victim F (26 Does) who was intending to enter the said E restaurant in a drunken state on the front of the “E cafeteria” road located in D, without any justifiable reason, put the victim into a fright hump which requires approximately four weeks of treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant injured the victim.

2. Defendant A, at the same time and place as above 1 paragraph (1), had the face of the victim B (23 years old) taken once, without any reason, once a victim B (23 years old), and had the victim’s body in response to the victim’s body due to drinking and birth, and had the victim’s body in response to the victim’s body, and had the victim suffered injury, such as an open body of each of the left-hand strings requiring treatment for about six weeks.

Accordingly, the defendant injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant B]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement corresponding to the part of the defendant in the police interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Medical certificate (F);

1. CCTV CD images [Defendant A]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A medical certificate (B);

1. Application of CCTV CD-related statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the Defendants’ choice of punishment regarding criminal facts: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; and the choice of fines (such as the Defendants’ mutual agreement and the reflection of mistake)

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The part dismissing the public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. On February 11, 2017, at around 03:30, the Defendant assaulted the F’s face that he/she had to enter the said E restaurant in the state of drinking on the front of the “E cafeteria” road located in Singing-si, Sing-si, without any justifiable reason, and then, when he/she continued to use the victim A (26 years of age)’s left-hand cream.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim A.

2. The offense charged with this part of the judgment may not be charged against the will expressed by the victim.