If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On May 15, 2012, the Defendant, at the agency for the mobile phone mobile phone service located in Gwangju Mine-gu, called "C", "D", "E", "E", "resident registration number", "F", "O", "OF", "OF", "OF", "OF", "OF", "OF", "OF", "OF", "I", "I", "I", and "D", respectively, on the paper of the new contract for the mobile phone service located in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, for the purpose of exercising the right, and signed on the paper of the new contract for the mobile phone service.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a new contract for DNA mobile phone service in the name of D, a private document on the duty of rights.

2. The Defendant: (a) issued one copy of the new contract for the mobile phone service, which was forged, to an employee in charge of SK Telecom, who is aware of forgery at the above time and at the above place, as if he were the contract, and exercised the right to use the forged mobile phone as if he were the contract; and (b) did not pay KRW 437,290 to the victim SK Telecom Co., Ltd. and did not pay KRW 437,290 of the fee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on new contracts, receipts, and claim details of mobile phone services;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act (the fact of fraud and the selection of fines) (the fact of fraud and the selection of fines);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;