부당징계구제재심판정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
. On June 10, 2014, the Intervenor took employment procedures, including publication of employment of marketing and personal reporters, to the marketing team division, and 49 employees, including C, and 47 external assistants.
After reviewing the resume, etc. of the intervenor, the intervenor evaluated that C's career, academic background, etc. of C who worked as an intern at the marketing team are excellent, and D (the intervenor's director in charge of personnel management) conducted an interview with C on June 23, 2014, and E (the intervenor's director in charge of personnel management) conducted an interview with C on June 26, 2014, and F (the head of the division of the intervenor), D, and E concluded a labor contract with C on June 30, 2014. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 25383, Jun. 29, 2014>
On the other hand, on June 25, 2014, the Plaintiff submitted an internship assessment report to C, and 5 points out of 7 items, which was assessed as follows in the last assessment items:
원본 Q10. [Future Career In B] I would recommend my URP If he/she takes B into account as future career.(*High score represents high will of recommendation) 1/2/3/4/5 EXPLAIN OPTION 5 Should provide her the attractive for full-time job to retain her in B 번역본 Q10. [B에서의 앞으로의 경력] 나는 그/그녀가 앞으로의 직업으로서 B를 고려한다면 나의 URP를 추천할 것입니다
(**The higher scores are 1/2/3/4/5 observers, 5 observers, and 1/2/2/4/5 observers, and C, on June 2, 2015, reported the following information to the Intervenor’s ombudsmans (Ombuds, internal grievance, or internal complaint processing body).
After completing the work on April 22, 2014 during the internship period of C, the Plaintiff: (a) followed with C and low-schip, and (b) took the drinking place; and (c) took the full-time withdrawal C into his office, and had sexual intercourse without C’s consent.
C At the time, considering the Plaintiff’s influence in URP program, the Plaintiff could not report the Plaintiff as quasi-rape, etc., and the Plaintiff is the same day.