If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On October 1, 2010, the Defendant arbitrarily sold 148 punishment (4,736,00 won), 86 punishment (8,000 won), 74 punishment (2,368,000 won), 200 won (2,300 won), 200 won (2,300 won), 300 won (2,300 won) from the victim D, and 125,219,00 won (1,80 won) from the Plaintiff’s 20,000 won (2,368,000 won) from the Defendant’s 20,000 won (2,368,000 won) from the Defendant’s 20,000 won (2,368,000 won), 30,000 won at his own discretion, and 10,010 won (30,000 won) from the Defendant’s 20,010 won (200 won).

Summary of Evidence

1. The statement of each part of the police suspect examination protocol against the defendant;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the custody of goods;

1. Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the relevant criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;