However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a car from 23:59 around 22, 2017, and proceeded to the intersection in front of the G hotel in the Daesung-gu F from the basin of the hot spring basin to the basin of the old rocks; (b) while the Defendant changed the vehicle line and obstructed the Defendant’s course while the Defendant changed the vehicle line.

misunderstandings, misunderstandings, and stimulates the victims, thereby threatening them.

On October 23, 2017, the Defendant continued to drive a road near the Daejeon Pungdong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-

From around 23:59 to around 00:13 minutes from the 23:59 to the 00:13-hour G hotel, which had been located in the G hotel F in the Daesung-gu W, the victim threatened the victim by towing the victim's vehicle at approximately 8.8 km away from the G hotel front of the G hotel, the amba-dong, the amba-dong, and the amba-dong to the 39-laneh road of the Sungsung-gu hot spring.

Accordingly, the defendant carried a motor vehicle, which is a dangerous object, and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A report on internal investigation (as regards shooting routes):

1. The CD (Defendant vehicle black image) (the Defendant and the defense counsel did not have the intention of intimidation as to whether the Defendant and the defense counsel constituted a scam driving;

The argument is asserted.

An act of notifying harm in a crime of intimidation is ordinarily based on ordinary language, or, as a case, it may give notice of harm and injury, and the intention of a crime of intimidation is aware that the actor is aware that it will give notice of harm and injury to that degree.