When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who drives B Launa taxi.

On February 11, 2016, the Defendant driven the above taxi on February 11, 2016, and driving the two-way two-lanes in front C along the one-lanes of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the road along the speed of 70km/h/h of the speed of the speed of 103.3km/h of the speed of the front of the front of the front of the road, due to the negligence of not showing the front of the road properly,

E In the front part of the right side of the high typ vehicle, the victim D suffers approximately 6 weeks of the body body felbling, etc., which requires approximately 4 weeks of treatment to the victim F (20 years of age) who is the passenger of the vehicle of the defendant, the diversification of the body felbing of the heavy water that requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the victim F (20 years of age), and the 1st head of the fus fus, which requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the same victim G (22 years of age), and the fusgs of the fuss of the offbus of the offbus fus, which require approximately 4 weeks of treatment to the same victim H (21 years of age), respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A traffic accident report and a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. List and record of seizure;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning sections, photographs (restricted speed display), images and field photographs;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment for Facts constituting an offense, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the Defendant’s negligence on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is serious, and the occurrence of four victims due to the negligence, and the degree of injury resulting therefrom, the punishment of fines prescribed in the summary order cannot be deemed to be excessive.