However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of K5 si.

On November 18, 2013, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol on 0.064% of blood alcohol concentration on 22:20%, driven the said taxi and proceeded at a speed of about 40 km in speed from the sculp police station to the speed of about 10km in front of the three-lane road in front of both vehicles near the intersection of the square of 11 in the sculpuk-dong, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

At night, the front door was an intersection with signalling, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely operate the driver by accurately manipulating the front door and operating the steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol and neglecting it, found that he was at the right time stopped by the vehicle stop signal from the front side of the said vehicle, and delayed later found the D franchise part of the victim C (the 42-year-year-old-car) driving, which was the backer part of the said K5-cab, and caused the falper part of the victim E (the 43-year-old-car) driving which was temporarily stopped on the front side of the said vehicle due to its shock.

Ultimately, the Defendant, through occupational negligence above, sustained injury to the victim C in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and injury to the victim E in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, such as salt and tensions, and suffered from the victim G (36 years of age) who was accompanied by the above Orussa car with a string of about two weeks of treatment, and at the same time destroyed the plosa car by scrapping it, and escaped without taking measures, such as immediately stopping the plosa car to ensure that approximately KRW 2,558,494 of repair cost, such as exchange of the plosa car, and saving the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E, C, and G.