부당이득금반환
1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:
(a) The corresponding money and each of the above money stated in the separate sheet of unjust enrichment.
1. The following facts can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 10 and Eul evidence No. 1 (including paper numbers):
On April 30, 1963, H completed the registration of transfer of ownership as Seoul Eastern District Court No. 12340 on the ground that the repayment was completed on April 25, 1963 with respect to the 51 Songpa-gu Seoul Songpa-gu Seoul District Court I (hereinafter “the land before division”).
B. On February 14, 1972, according to the decision of the urban planning facilities (road) publicly notified by the J of the Construction Division on April 7, 1971, the Mayor of Seoul Special Metropolitan City approved the implementation plan for the urban planning project (road) for the newly constructed construction works of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the construction period from February 14, 1972 to June 30, 1972, and divided the land in conflict with the said construction while implementing the said road construction. The land owned by H was also the land in conflict with the said road construction works.
Accordingly, the land before subdivision was divided into 27, 6, and 18 square meters before M on February 25, 1972. Each of the above partitioned lands was divided into a river, and the category of N and O land was changed into a road on July 20, 1972, and the land category of N andO land was changed to a road and became an attached table 1 through 3 (hereinafter referred to as “each of the above lands”) following the change of administrative jurisdiction over each of the above divided lands.
C. After that, on January 16, 1981, the Mayor of Seoul Special Metropolitan City approved the urban planning project implementation plan (road) as published PP on January 16, 1981, and incorporated each of the instant land into the site for Q expansion and packing construction.
After H died on April 11, 1972, on August 24, 2012, the Plaintiffs, who were their successors, completed the registration of transfer of each of the instant land, which is the property of the deceased H, based on inheritance due to consultation and division on August 24, 2012.
E. The defendant is each of the above cases.