However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

[2014 Highest 2842] Defendants co-own-gu around 23:00 on February 17, 2014, the victim F in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, intended to sell one smartphone that he/she acquired from the way in a motor vehicle parked in the "G" store franchising on the way in which he/she works as an employee, and even if he/she was golded, he/she was able to purchase the relevant smartphone, and the above smartphone was registered as a stolen cell phone and cannot be seen. The victim was unable to take a smartphone if he/she did not take an improper business trip. The victim's request for a return of the smartphone to the effect that "the victim was no longer 50,000 won if he/she did not pay the withdrawal equipment." Defendant A means that "the victim was exposed to some of the victim's mobile phone," and Defendant A cannot return it to the purport that "the victim was no longer able to request a return of the market price."

As a result, the Defendants jointly received the property by threatening the victim.

[2014 Highest 3531] Defendants joint and several means a mobile phone with the purport that, on February 22, 2014, the Defendants jointly carried out a mobile phone with the victim H (16 years of age) who seeks to sell one mobile phone at the market price of 2.50,000 won in the Swiss area located near the Southern East-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si