2. Determination of the grounds for appeal of this case is recognized as favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and divided in depth, the amount of the theft of this case is minor, the theft was returned to the victim, and the defendant returned 3,000,000 won to the victim G in the original trial and restored part of the damage.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant who stolen the wheelchairs of the patient at the hospital, and acquired 7,00,000,000 won under the pretext of attorney's appointment by taking advantage of the imminent circumstances of the victim G who is detained, and embezzled 1,50,000 won, and the crime is not good, and the defendant has been punished more than 50 times in total, including seven times of the same crime. In particular, on August 22, 2008, the crime of this case and embezzlement was committed repeatedly during the period of the repeated offense, which was sentenced to 1 year and six months of imprisonment due to fraud, and was committed repeatedly during the period of the repeated offense, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable, and thus, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is not reasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.