[criminal records] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on November 28, 2014 to six months after the suspension of execution due to interference with business in the Youngcheon District Court’s Yeongdeungpo Branch’s subsidies, etc. on March 26, 2015, a fine of two million won as a crime of refusing to withdraw from the Seoul Central District Court on March 26, 2015, and on January 17, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for interference with business by the Seoul Southern District Court on January 25, 2017, and the said judgment becomes final and conclusive on January 25, 201

[2] On March 18, 2017, around 21:30, the Defendant entered the above store without any justifiable reason within the 'D cafeteria operated by the victim C in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (a) 5 male customers and 2 female customers; (b) d c s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s ss s

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant operation by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts [determination of sentence]: Imprisonment with prison labor for four months (4 months (10 months) shall be determined as per Disposition, comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances: Defendant’s age, sex, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of crime, and circumstances after the crime.

The favorable circumstances are confessioned, and are against the law.

The degree of damage is heavy.

shall not be deemed to exist.

On January 17, 2017, the Seoul Southern District Court was sentenced to one year of a suspended sentence of 4 months due to interference with the business of the Seoul Southern District Court on January 17, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 25, 2017, and was still under the suspended sentence period, but it was still under the period of a suspended sentence of 2 months, and therefore, it committed

A person who was unable to receive an explanatory note from the injured party.