However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On November 2016, the Defendant, upon receiving a proposal from an employee in charge of the phishing crime (hereinafter “D”) under his/her name, who was aware of the receipt of the text message on the job offering advertisement, and received the message from the employee in charge of the phishing crime (hereinafter “the Defendant would receive cash from another person and transfer it to an account designated by him/her, pay 1% of the total amount at the expense.” The Defendant, in turn, conspiredd to commit the phishing crime in order to commit the phishing by receiving the damage amount from the victims to another account (hereinafter “one-time passbook”) under the name of an unspecified number of victims in the Republic of Korea by misrepresenting his/her employees, etc. from the investigative agency, and by sending it to the designated account.

2. On November 7, 2016, the 2017-type 4568-type 4568-type 8-type 201-type 8-type 201-type 4568-type 8-type 200-type 4568-type 8-type 201-type 10,000-type 10,000-type 10,000-type 4568-type 8-type 40-type 4568-type 8-type 20-type 20-type 20-type 200-type 10,000 won was transferred to one bank account (U-type 50,000) in the name of the victim in collusion with the victim in collusion with the victim, thereby deceiving the victim from 19,500,000 won.

3. A crime under subparagraph 5797 of Article 2017.

A. On December 13, 2016, the 2010-day employee of the 2010-day Financial Supervisory Service’s false statement to the effect that “The 201-day Financial Supervisory Service misrepresents the victim V with an investigator belonging to the prosecutor’s office at a place not known to the public around December 13, 2016, and transfers money to the account designated by the internal authority to investigate whether the 30-day Financial Supervisory Service’s account was used for a crime and is open to the public.”