For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the grounds that there was no proof of the relevant crime.

The judgment below

In light of the record, the reasoning of the lower court did not err by misapprehending the facts against logical and empirical rules or by misapprehending the relevant legal doctrine, or omitting judgment, without exhaust all necessary deliberations as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.