beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.06 2015노3508

자동차관리법위반

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Recognizing the fact that the defendant has affixed a Stick that reflects light on the front number plate of a car, but the vehicle number is well shown even when the above Stick was attached, and there is no problem at the time when the control camera is displayed, and the act of this case does not constitute “an act making it difficult to identify a registration number plate”.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (the fine of 500,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The case holding that it is difficult for the police officer (D) who has discovered the Defendant's vehicle to find out the following circumstances, i.e., the evidence legitimately adopted and investigated by the court below, stating that the police officer, around 20:30 on March 17, 2015, on the Defendant's vehicle number plate located on the front of the Dongdae Station Cultural Park, Jung-gu, Seoul, and that the police officer, in fact, taken the Defendant's vehicle number plate on the same day on the same day, the number plate is not well known due to light posted by the Defendant's vehicle number plate at the time of photographing the number plate, and that the number is not well known; 2. Where the Defendant posted the light number tag at the vehicle number plate at a low time or at the time of parking, it is difficult to identify the vehicle number plate at the time of posting it, but it is also difficult for the Defendant to set up 10-day and 2.0-day notice and 15-day notice prior to the Defendant's display of the light number plate at 2.