except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around July 2013, the Defendant: (a) had completed the construction work entrusted by the Victim C (Age 64) with a toilet, etc.; (b) had not been paid the construction cost by the victim in full; (c) had a dispute with the victim as an issue of construction cost by telephone; (d) around 16:30 on July 30, 2013, the Defendant expressed a large interest that “When the victim was found to be the victim’s house at Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D apartment 12 Dong 802, the Defendant 12-dong 12-dong 802, it would be incidental to the Defendant’s construction work to reduce or reduce the amount.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness C and E;

1. Statement by the prosecution against C;

1. Photographs;

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that, while the instant crime was committed, the Defendant’s determination on the issue of text messages was based on the brush at the time of committing the instant crime and found the victim’s apartment, he merely went to the ward by placing the apartment door in the apartment room, and did not directly threaten the victim.

그러나 위에서 든 증거들에 의하면 ① 피해자 C은 이 법정 및 수사기관에서 일관되게 피고인이 망치를 손에 쥔 상태에서 피해자의 거실로 들어와 위협적인 발언을 하였다고 진술하고 있고, ② 피고인도 피해자의 시동생에게 ‘망치를 들고 가서 피해자와 싸워 공사대금을 받아냈다’라는 취지의 말을 한 점 등에 비추어 볼 때 피해자가 단지 피고인에게 초과로 송금한 돈을 반환받기 위하여 허위로 진술하였다고 보기 어려우며, ③ 가사 피고인의 주장과 같이 피해자의 거실에 들어오면서 망치를 내려놓았다고 하더라도, 피해자로서는 컴퓨터 방 안에서 망치를 손에 쥐고 흥분한 상태로 피해자의 집 현관문 안으로 들어오는 피고인의 모습을 목격하였을 때 공포심을 느꼈으리라고 봄이 상당하므로 이후 피해자가 거실 밖으로 나왔을 때...