사기등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
From February 2, 2009 to December 2, 2010, the Defendant, as a victim D's member company in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was in charge of the sales and collection of alcoholic beverages of the said company, received orders from the customer who reduced monthly salary from the customer who was in charge of the sales and collection of alcoholic beverages of the said company, and received alcoholic beverages delivery, and sold them to the retailers of alcoholic beverages, thereby raising a living cost.
1. Fraud;
A. A. Around July 26, 2010, the Defendant entered the fact in the victim’s office into a false computer as if he received an order of 400 bits, including daily mileage, in sequence, from E, even though he received an order of temporary release of 700 bits from E, and then sold the remaining 493 bits to the retail of alcoholic beverages with their names on the same day. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 22190, Jul. 29, 2010; Presidential Decree No. 22320, Jul. 29, 2010; Presidential Decree No. 22348, Aug. 27, 2010; Presidential Decree No. 223068, Jul. 29, 2010; Presidential Decree No. 22303,
As a result, the defendant deceivings the victim, and 493 taxt market value of 24,624,248 won, which is the 493 taxt market value, such as mileage, was acquired by the victim.
B. On December 16, 2010, the Defendant entered the fact in the said victim’s office in the computer as if he received an order from F to 240 bit, which is the 240-year-old scambling Kas, from F, even though he did not receive an order from F to the 30-year-old scambam consumptioner, and then sold the 80-year-old scam from F to the 80-year-old retail on the same day.
Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim, and thereby deceivings the amount of 2,842,40 won in the market price of 80 feet from the victim.
2. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;
A. On December 6, 2010, the Defendant, by means of a computer on December 6, 2010, stated that the Defendant would pay the price of goods in installments for two months due to a mistake between the agency and the method of payment and the agency’s business.