If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

[criminal power] On March 4, 2009, at the Gwangju District Court, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and a fine of KRW 1 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the same court on March 27, 2009, respectively. On October 6, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of Drinking Measures) by the same court on October 6, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

On April 11, 2020, under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.136% on the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, the Defendant was under the influence of criminal punishment as above, but without obtaining the driver’s license, driven a vehicle with approximately 10 meters section of 10 meters from the street around the eromo-gun Burel to D in front of the road located in C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstantial statement of the driver and the report on the traffic accident;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (criminal records confirmation reports);

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1), Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is based on a comprehensive consideration of the criminal records of the defendant, the nature and risk of the crime of this case, the circumstances leading up to the crime, the degree of taking the crime, the family relationship, the health condition of the defendant, and the possibility of recidivism as stated in the records and arguments of this case.